Prof. Dr.

Anna Schuboe

Prof. Dr.  Anna Schuboe

Prof. Dr. Anna Schuboe

Mein Forschungsschwerpunkt liegt auf der Rolle von Aufmerksamkeit in der visuellen Informationsverarbeitung. Besonders interessiert mich, wie Menschen visuelle Informationen aus einer komplexen Umwelt auswählen, und auf welche Weise verschiedene Faktoren wie visuelle Salienz, Vorabwissen, und die Intention des Betrachters die Selektion beeinflussen.

In unseren Experimenten kombinieren wir verschiedene experimentelle und neurokognitive Verfahren (Verhaltensmessung, Aufzeichnen von Bewegungsparametern und EEG), um zu untersuchen, wie unser Gehirn selektive Aufmerksamkeit und höhere visuelle Verarbeitung implementiert.

Kontaktdaten
Philipps Universität Marburg
FB 04 Psychologie
Gutenbergstr. 18
35032 Marburg
+49 (0)6421 28 25 594

E-Mail
Homepage

  • Dötsch, D., Vesper, C., & A. Schubö (2017). How you move is what I see: Planning an action biases a partner’s visual search. Frontiers in psychology, 8:77. find paper
  • Feldmann-Wuestefeld, T., & Schuboe, A. (2016). Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1-13. find paper
  • Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T. & Schubö, A. (2015). Action planning mediates guidance of visual attention from working memory. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2015, 387378. find paper
  • Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., Brandhofer, R., & Schubö, A. (2016). Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts. Psychophysiology, 53, 1063-1073. DOI find paper
  • Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., Uengoer, M. & Schubö, A. (2015). You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 52, 1483–1497. DOI find paper
  • Heuer, A. & A. Schubö (2016). Selective weighting of action-related feature dimensions on visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-6.DOI find paper
  • Heuer, A., & Schubö, A. (2018). Separate and combined effects of action relevance and motivational value on visual working memory. Journal of vision, 18(5), 14-14. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.5.14. find paper
  • Heuer, A., Crawford, J.D. & a. Schubö (2017). Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 45,413-427. DOI find paper
  • Kadel, H., Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T. & A. Schubö (2017). Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control. Psychophysiology, 54(5), 736-754. DOI find paper

Ältere projektrelevante Veröffentlichungen

  • Akyürek, E. G., & Schubö, A. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of early attentional feature selection and distractor filtering. Biological Psychology, 93(2), 269-278.
  • Feldmann-Wüstefeld, T., & Schubö, A. (2013). Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement. Journal of Vision, 13 (3): 11, 1-12.
  • Leszczynski, M., Myers, N., Akyürek, E. G., & Schubö, A. (2012). Recoding between two types of short-term memory representation revealed by the dynamics of memory search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 653-663.
  • Schankin, A., & Schubö, A. (2009). Cognitive processes facilitated by contextual cueing. Evidence from eventrelated brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 46, 668-679.
  • Schankin, A., & Schubö, A. (2010). Contextual cueing effects despite of spatially cued target locations. Psychophysiology, 47, 717-727.
  • Schubö, A., & Müller, H. J. (2009). Selecting and ignoring salient objects in visual search. Brain Research, 1283, 84-101.
  • Schubö, A., Gendolla, G.H.E., Meinecke, C. & Abele, A.E. (2006). Detecting emotional faces and features in a visual search paradigm: are faces special? Emotion, 6, 246-256.
  • Schubö, A., Schlaghecken, F., & Meinecke, C. (2001). Learning to ignore the mask in texture segmentation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 919-931.
  • Wykowska, A., & Schubö, A. (2010). On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 640-654.
  • Wykowska, A., & Schubö, A. (2011). Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce non-spatial filtering costs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 645-660.
  • Wykowska, A., Hommel, B., & Schubö, A. (2011). Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 1034–1041.
  • Wykowska, A., Schubö, A., & Hommel, B. (2009). How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1755-1769.