Introduction
Our research is directed at understanding information processing
in the visual system during visual and motor judgements. Our
laboratory in Gießen includes set-ups for studies on visual perception
(color vision and perception of natural scenes) and sensori-motor
coordination, including state-of-the-art equipment for eye-tracking
(EyeLinkII, DPI Eyetracker), motion analysis (Optotrak-3020 System,
Zebris Tracking System), and for the manipulation of
visual-proprioceptive information (PHANToM- force feedback device).
We currently primarily use psychophysical methods, but future
research questions are also directed at studying the neural correlates
of sensori-motor control. Collaborations have recently been
established within the joint graduate program Neuronal
representation and action control with the Department of
Neurophysics and
Department of Experimental and Clinical Biopsychology at the
nearby Philipps-Universität
Marburg.
In addition, our lab participates in national and international
co-operations directed at studying the behavioral and neural aspects
of sensori-motor control (Research Training Network on Perception for Recognition and
Action funded by the European Commission; Forschungsverbund MODKOG,
funded by the BMBF).
Research Areas
Color Vision
Prof. Karl Gegenfurtner, Ph.D. ,
Dr. Thorsten Hansen,
Dipl.-Psych. Martin Giesel, Dipl.-Psych. Christoph Witzel
The perception of color is a central component of primate vision.
Colour facilitates object perception and recognition, and has an
important role in scene segmentation and visual memory. Despite the
long history of colour vision studies, much there is still much to be
learned about the physiological basis of colour perception. Recent
studies are beginning to indicate that colour is processed not in
isolation, but together with information about luminance and visual
form to achieve a unitary and robust representation of the visual
world.
Selected Publications
- Hansen, T., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2006). Higher level chromatic
mechanisms for image segmentation. Journal
of Vision, 6(3), 239\u2013259.
[PDF]
- Hansen, T., Olkkonen, M., Walter, S. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2006). Memory modulates color appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 9(11), 1367–1368.
- Gegenfurtner, K.R. (2003) Cortical
mechanisms of colour vision. Nature
Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 563–572. [PDF]
- Gegenfurtner, K.R. & Kiper, D.C. (2003) Color
vision. Annual Review of
Neuroscience, 26, 181–206.[PDF]
Haptic Perception
Dr. Knut Drewing,
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Lukas Kaim , M.Sc. Cristiano Cellini, Dr. Matthias Bischoff
Haptic perception is inherently rather active than passive. It substantially depends upon the active intake of sensory information via exploratory movements. Whereas, for example, eye movements in vision primarily serve the re-orientation of the fovea towards the stimulus of interest, in active touch it is the exploratory (hand) movements that generate the sensory signals from which the percept is then derived. In quantitative studies, we examine what the consequences of exploratory movement for haptic perception are and according to which criteria we control our exploratory movements. Further studies investigate into the combination of haptic with visual or auditory information as regards its development in childhood (cooperation with Dr. Jovanovic from Entwicklungspsychologie), its boundary conditions (cooperation with Matthias Bischoff from BION) and the multimodal guidance of motor timing.
Selected publications
-
Drewing, K., & Ernst, M.O. (2006). Integration of force and position cues for shape perception through active touch. Brain Research 1078, 92-100.
- Drewing, K. (2006). Integration of tactile-kinesthetic and auditory (re-)afference in the timing of movements. Proceedings of the Eurohaptics international conference 2006, 43-48.
Perception and eye movements in natural scenes
Prof. Karl Gegenfurtner, Ph.D., Dipl.-Psych. Gesche Hübner
We study the principles underlying the selection of fixation
targets under natural viewing conditions. We study fixation patterns
and saccadic latencies of human subjects viewing under natural images
and videos of natural scenes and ask how stimulus features like
contrast, color and spatial frequency content interact with top-down
mediated expectations.
Selected Publications
- Thorpe, S., Gegenfurtner, K.R., Fabre-Thorpe, M. &
Bülthoff, H.H. (2001) Detection
of animals in natural images using far peripheral vision. European
Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 869-876. <Get
PDF file>
- Gegenfurtner, K.R. & Rieger, J. (2000) Sensory
and cognitive contributions of color to the perception of natural
scenes.Current Biology, 10, 805-808. <Get
PDF file>
Eye movements and Visual Perception
Dr. Jutta Billino, Dr. Doris Braun, Cristiano Cellini, M.Sc., Kurt Debono, M.Sc., Barthélémy Durette, Ph.D., Prof. Karl Gegenfurtner, Ph.D., Dr. Alexander Schütz
Humans frequently move their eyes, either to fixate a new location in the visual field
(saccadic eye movements), or to keep fixation on a moving object (smooth pursuit eye movements).
These eye movements pose two problems. First, an appropriate target location and
execution time has to be selected for the eye movements. Hence we study,
which visual signals are used to guide these eye movements, i.e. how visual perception influences the
control of eye movements. Second, the execution of eye movements changes the visual image on the retina.
To maintain a clear and stable perception of the world, the visual system has to cope with the retinal
image motion. In this context we study how visual perception is affected by the execution of concurrent
eye movements.
Our experimental approach comprises psychophysics measurements under simultaneous tracking of eye movements to
investigate the bidirectional relationship between perception and eye movements.
Selected Publications
- Schütz, A.C., Braun, D.I., Kerzel, D. & Gegenfurtner, K.R.
(2008) Improved visual sensitivity during smooth pursuit eye movements.
Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1211-1216.
- Spering, M. & Gegenfurtner, K.R. (2008). Contextual effects on motion
perception and smooth pursuit eye movements. Brain Research, 1225, 76-85.
- White, B.J., Stritzke, M. & Gegenfurtner, K.R.
(2008) Saccadic facilitation in natural backgrounds. Current Biology, 18, 124-128.
Visually guided motor behavior
Dr. Volker Franz, Dipl.-Psych. Owino Eloka, Dipl.-Psych. Urs Kleinholdermann
We investigate the complex mechanisms involved in interactions of
humans with the environment. The versatility of the human visuo-motor
system can be seen in the ease with which we perform everyday tasks
such as reaching and grasping for objects under varying visual input.
For example, we can easily grasp fragile objects like eggs (we might
even learn to juggle them), or we might learn to adapt quickly to the
distortions introduced by wearing left-right reversing prisms, etc. On
the other hand, it is still very difficult to devise technical systems
which are capable of only a subset of the capabilities of the human
motor system.
One of the questions we have been studying intensively during
recent years is whether the visual guidance of motor behavior is
achieved by different processes (and neuronal substrates) as our
conscious (visual) perception. Studies on neurological patients
suggest such a division of labor in the human brain and it was
suggested that this dissociation between vision-for-action and
vision-for-perception can also be found in healthy humans. Support for
this view came from studies which found that grasping is less affected
by visual illusions than perception. Our results, to the contrary,
suggest that the motor system uses very similar processes and neuronal
signals as visual perception. This suggests that the brain is more
coherent than currently proposed by a number of theories in visual
neuroscience.
We use an Optotrak 3020
system to measure precisely position and timing of grasping and
pointing movements. To control the Optotrak we use a specifically
designed Matlab
Toolbox (or C++).
Selected Publications
- V. H. Franz. Planning versus online control: Dynamic illusion effects in
grasping? Spatial Vision, 16(3-4):211 - 223, 2003. [PDF]
- V. H. Franz. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(11):457 - 459, 2001. [PDF]
- V. H. Franz, K. R. Gegenfurtner, H. H. Bülthoff, and M. Fahle. Grasping
visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and
action. Psychological Science, 11(1):20 - 25, 2000.
[PDF]
|